Indian Journal of Research in Homeopathy

: 2019  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 91--99

Pharmacognostic and physicochemical study of Urtica urens L.: A drug used in Homoeopathy

Satish Patel1, Bibaswan Biswas1, K Rambabu1, Shyaga Jhansi1, Ramchander Potu1, EN Sundaram1, Renu Arya2,  
1 Drug Standardisation Unit (H), Hyderabad, Telangana, India
2 Central Council for Research In Homoeopathy, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Mr. Satish Patel
Drug Standardisation Unit (H), O.U.B-32, Vikrampuri, Road No. 4, Habsiguda, Hyderabad - 500 007, Telangana


Background: Urtica urens L. (Family Urticaceae), known as annual nettle, dwarf nettle, small nettle, dog nettle or burning nettle, is used in the treatment of arthritis, uric acid diseases, benign prostatic hyperplasia and burn. In Homoeopathy, the whole plant is used for the treatment of gout, uric acid diathesis, joint pain, lithiasis, urticaria and agalactia and burns. Objective: The objectives of the present study were to investigate morpho-anatomical, powder and physicochemical standards of the whole plant of Urtica urens for authentication and identification of raw drug. Materials and Methods: The current study includes macroscopical and microscopical study of root, stem, leaf and powder and physicochemical studies of whole plant powder and mother tincture of Urtica urens. Results: The taproot is rounded, thick and brown; leaves are long petiolate, elliptic to broadly ovate; stem 0.5–1 cm thick, rounded and branched. Qualitative and quantitative microscopic studies showed the distinguishing characters of root stem and leaf. In physicochemical studies of the drug, extractive values in alcohol and water were ≤7.52 and ≤13.88% w/w, respectively; loss on drying, total, acid insoluble and water-soluble ash were found to be ≤11.75, ≤24.55, ≤3.59 and ≤6.89% w/w, respectively. In mother tincture, weight per millilitre, alcohol content, total solids, pH and λmax were found to be ≥0.97 g, 47% v/v–52% v/v, ≤1.88% w/v, 7.93 and 266, 279 nm, respectively. Conclusion: The data presented in this communication may be used as diagnostic characters for identification and authentication of raw drug so as to ensure purity, quality and efficacy of homoeopathic drug Urtica urens.

How to cite this article:
Patel S, Biswas B, Rambabu K, Jhansi S, Potu R, Sundaram E N, Arya R. Pharmacognostic and physicochemical study of Urtica urens L.: A drug used in Homoeopathy.Indian J Res Homoeopathy 2019;13:91-99

How to cite this URL:
Patel S, Biswas B, Rambabu K, Jhansi S, Potu R, Sundaram E N, Arya R. Pharmacognostic and physicochemical study of Urtica urens L.: A drug used in Homoeopathy. Indian J Res Homoeopathy [serial online] 2019 [cited 2023 Feb 5 ];13:91-99
Available from:

Full Text


Urtica urens L. (syn: Urtica trianae Rusby), commonly known as lesser nettle, belongs to the family Urticaceae. It is an erect, ascending, annual herb which is distributed widely throughout the temperate zone of the world. Urtica urens is also known as burning nettle or dog nettle (English), Ortiegrieche (French) and Brennessel (German). It closely resembles the stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.) in habit, other than smaller leaves and flowers.[1] The 'Urtica' word was originated from 'uro' means to burn or Latin word 'urere' means to sting.[2],[3] This word 'Urtica' is derived mainly due to the presence of urticant hairs.[4] It is native of Europe; introduced in Uttarakhand, India, and mainly found in shady moist areas.

The Urtica urens is herbaceous in nature and simple or branched up to 70 cm in height. Stem is erect and ascending, frequently branching, glabrous and possesses numerous stinging hairs. Leaves are simple, opposite, stalked, long-petioled, elliptic to broadly ovate, stipulate and incised-dentate with less stinging hair. Greenish-white short flowers are present mainly in clusters. Both male and female flowers occur on the same plant. Inflorescence is cylindrical and spike-like. Fruits are dry achenes, yellowish brown, indehiscent and one-seeded. Various chemical constituents namely flavonoids, 13-hydroxy octadecatrienoic acid, Vitamin B family, Vitamin C, Vitamin K, caffeic acid, caffeoyl-esters, carotenoids (Lutein, β-carotene), polysaccharides, protein, minerals (Ca, Fe, Mg, P, K, Na) and terpenes have been reported.[5],[6],[7],[8]

The members of the Nettles family have long been used for the treatment of various ailments as a home remedy. Urtica urens has been reported to possess anti-oxidant and anti-microbial (leaves),[8] chemoprotective (aerial parts),[9] anxiolytic (aerial parts),[5] anti-inflammatory (leaves),[10],[11] anti-arthritis (leaves)[12] and anti-bacterial (leaves)[13] activities. Various ethnomedicinal uses of dwarf nettle for different ailments are given in [Table 1].{Table 1}

In Homoeopathy , Urtica urens is widely used for the treatment of uric acid-related problems such as gout, uric acid diathesis, joint pain, lithiasis, urticaria, allergy, itching, insect bites and burns. It is also used to increase the lactation (agalactia) in females and in spleen affection.[16],[17],[18]

Although Urtica urens is widely used in different indigenous systems including Homoeopathy for various ailments, however, a review of literature reveals lack of data on pharmacognostic and physicochemical standards. In medical system, sub-standard drug will not bring the desired therapeutic results. Hence, drug standardisation study is one of the most fundamental prerequisites to ensure genuineness/authenticity and to lay down standards for the purity, quality, safety and efficacy of raw drugs as well as finished products. The data generated through standardisation studies not only provide a guideline for the manufacturing of homoeopathic drugs but also provide quality drugs to the homoeopathic practitioners. The present study was undertaken to generate standard data for identification/authentication of correct species of Urtica urens. The data presented in this study may also be considered 'pharmacopoeial standards' to ensure the purity and quality of raw drug Urtica urens.

 Materials and Methods


Hydrochloric acid (Finar, India), Fuchsin (Finar, India), Crystal violet (Spectrochem, India), Safranin (Finar, India), Xylene (Fisher Scientific), tert-Butyl alcohol (Finar, India) and Paraffin (Merck). All chemicals used in the studies were of analytical grade.

Plant collection

The material of Urtica urens was obtained from Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia Laboratory (HPL), Ministry of AYUSH, Govt. of India, Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh), India. The pharmacognostic and physicochemical parameters were carried out as per the protocol/procedures specified in Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of India.[19] The whole plant material was dried in shadow. The dried plant was grounded into coarse powder to 10/44 (sieve size) for the determination of different physicochemical parameters and preparation of mother tincture. Organoleptic characters were evaluated by observing its external appearance such as shape, size, colour, odour, taste and other visual observation as per prescribed methods.[20]

Macroscopy studies

The macroscopic evaluation includes morphologic depiction of plant parts using the naked eye. It is the method of qualitative evaluation based on the study of morphological and sensory profile of plant drug. Macroscopic characteristics of stem, leaves and root were noted on the basis of visual observation of raw drug materials as per the prescribed methods.[20],[21] It includes observation of shape, size, colour, odour, taste, venation, surface texture, nature of plant and fractures.

Microscopy studies

Both qualitative and quantitative microscopic evaluations were performed using Olympus compound microscope (BX 53, Olympus Germany). In qualitative evaluation, stem, leaf and root were boiled separately, cut into small pieces and processed with paraffin method of microtomy.[22] The transverse section cut at 12 μm and was stained with safranin, crystal violet and basic fuchsine and subjected for microscopic observations. Photographs were taken using Olympus BX 53 Research Trinocular Microscope. In quantitative evaluation, different parameters namely stomatal number, stomatal index, vein islet number and palisade ration of leaf were calculated as per prescribed procedure and formula.[23],[24]

Powder studies

Microscopic observations of the powdered drug were performed by boiling the powder in distilled water followed by staining in safranin and mount with glycerine on the slide.

Organoleptic characters

Organoleptic characters of powder were evaluated by taking a minute quantity of powder and spread on a white background and visually examined for general appearance namely nature, colour, odour, taste and texture.

Physicochemical studies

The dried plant material was coarsely powdered and subjected for physicochemical studies which include Loss On Drying (LOD), ash values and extractive values. Mother tincture was prepared following the method described in Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of India[19] and subjected for its specific gravity measurement, test for saponins, pH-metry, chromatographic profile and Ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy studies.

Thin layer chromatography

Around 25 mL of mother tincture was heated on a water bath to remove the alcohol. The organics from the aqueous part was extracted using three 25 mL portions of chloroform. The chloroform extract was evaporated to around 2 mL, and Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) was performed using the concentrated chloroform extract using silica gel and chloroform: Methanol (9:1) as mobile phase. The spots were detected using UV-light of wavelength 365 nm and 254 nm.

 Observations and Results

Pharmacognostic studies


Macroscopic studies revealed that root is branched taproot, rounded with wiry rootlets, 1–1.5 cm thick and brown in colour; leaves are long-petioled, elliptic to broadly ovate in shape, green in colour and incised-dentate. Leaf is totally morphologically different from closely related species of Urtica i.e., U. dioica (leaves are uneven and more robust); stem is 0.5–1 cm thick, green in colour, rounded and branched [Figure 1].{Figure 1}

Qualitative microscopic studies


Transverse section of root bark shows the presence of 6–8 layered outermost phellem. Cells of phellem are tabular, rectangular and tangentially elongated. Phellem is followed by 1–2 layered phellogen cells. Phellogen cells are also tangentially elongated. Phelloderm or secondary cortex followed by phellogen is many-layered and made up of secondary phloem and secondary xylem. Secondary phloem is present underneath the cortex and contains phloem parenchyma, sieve cells and phloem fibres. Xylem present with alternating areas of lignified and un-lignified parenchyma in the wide medullary rays. Secondary xylem is abundant inside consisting of vessels and tracheids subsequently enclosed by fibres and xylem parenchyma. Tracheids are arranged in radial rows. Secondary walls show boarder pits with few scalariform and helical thickenings. Vessels are oval to spherical and sometime polygonal in shape [Figure 2].{Figure 2}


Transverse section of stem is rounded in outline. The epidermis is single layered. Epidermal cells are tabular and barrel shaped. Epidermis is covered by thick cuticle. Epidermis is followed by hypodermis which is 4–6 layered with tangentially elongated cells with scanty contents. Cortex is followed by sclerenchymatous cells distributed widely over the vascular bundle and show wide lumen. Many cluster crystal is present in the parenchyma. At various places, parenchymatous cells are interrupted by air cavities. Phloem is reduced and consists of phloem parenchyma, fibres and sieve elements. Phloem cells are present in a ring. Xylem consists of vessels and tracheids arranged in radial rows. Along with this, few isolated fibres and xylem parenchyma are also present. Secondary xylem is with deep ridges in pith and made up of vessels and wide sclerenchymatous tissue and air cavities. Centrally located pith shows abundant large polygonal to spherical parenchymatous cells with air cavities [Figure 3].{Figure 3}


Transverse section of midvein of the leaf shows grooved on the upper surface and prominently ribbed on the lower surface. Epidermis is single-layered, and epidermal cells are barrel-shaped with sinuous anticlinal walls. The presence of abundant lithocysts or idioblasts in epidermal cell is clearly visible. The epidermis is followed by mesophyll region which is differentiated into palisade and spongy tissue. Palisade tissue is single layered with columnar cells and interrupted by air cavities i.e., schizogenous cavities whereas, spongy parenchyma is 3–4 layered. Abaxially, spongy parenchyma cells are loosely arranged. Ground tissue of midvein is composed of 5–7 layered parenchymatous cells which are polygonal to spherical in shape. Leaf midvein consists of single vascular bundle at centre. Vascular bundles are conjoint, collateral, endarch and open. Tracheary elements are arranged in radial rows [Figure 4].{Figure 4}

Quantitative microscopic studies

Epidermal cells are 4–5 sided, few epidermal cells are 6 sided and polygonal in shapes. Sides of epidermal cells are straight to curved and thick walled. Contents within few epidermal cells are dense. Stomata are present mainly occur on lower surface, stomata are anomocytic, anisocytic and rarely diacytic [Figure 5] and [Figure 6]. Trichomes are peltate hairs confined on lower surface and unicellular conical hairs are present on upper surface. Stomatal index was found to be 18 sq. mm. The vein islet number and palisade ratio were found to be 8–10.5 and 2–3.5 respectively.{Figure 5}{Figure 6}

Powder studies

The powder microscopy study shows the presence of pieces of epidermal cells with idioblasts, plentiful thin-walled parenchymatous cells, pieces of unicellular trichomes broken or whole, numerous fibres either broken, isolated, fragments of sclerenchymatous tissue with wide lumen cell, pieces of lignified and un-lignified parenchyma, fragments of broken tracheary tissues with vessels; cells with border pits few scalariform and helical thickenings.

Organoleptic characters

Colour: GreenTouch: SmoothOdour: Not CharacteristicTaste: Not Characteristic.

Physicochemical studies

The results of physicochemical study of the raw drug are summarised in [Table 2]. The LOD was found to be 11.75% which is important to gauge the amount of raw wet drug needed for the mother tincture. Besides LOD, the ash values (particularly total ash) are considerably high indicating the appreciable amount of metals present in the drug. The acid insoluble ash value is quite low suggesting a lower amount of heavy elements. A considerable amount of water-soluble ash suggests that significant amount of alkali metals are present in the raw drug and high values of the water and ethanol extracts indicated that the raw drug has a substantial amount of polar constituents. These values also suggest that ethanol and water could successfully extract appreciable amount of constituents from the plant.{Table 2}

[Table 3] depicts the physicochemical data including organoleptic profile of finished product (mother tincture). The pH of the mother tincture is close to the pH-7. The UV-spectra of the mother tincture is quite characteristics and could be employed for quality assurance. TLC study performed on chloroform extract of the mother tincture provided few well-resolved characteristics spot indicating diverse chemical composition of the mother tincture.{Table 3}

Comparative study with commercial mother tincture

The work was supplemented by a comparative study between the in-house and commercial mother tinctures. The data of the comparative study are summarised in [Table 3] and shown in [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9]. The colours of the samples differ slightly indicating that in terms of organoleptic parameters, the in-house and commercial samples are comparable. The UV-Vis spectra of the samples are similar. The other parameters are also similar. We then further extended this study by performing TLC on the in-house and commercial sample. From the TLC study, it is quite evident that the samples are quite similar; however, the relative portion of the different constituents differs considerably. This could be attributed to the choice of the solvent system. Overall, the commercial sample possesses analytical values similar to the in-house sample.{Figure 7}{Figure 8}{Figure 9}


Standardisation or quality control study of homoeopathic drug plays a major role to ensure its purity, quality, genuineness, safety and efficacy. The present study represents the detailed macroscopic, qualitative and quantitative microscopical studies, powder microscopical studies and physicochemical standards of raw drugs and mother tincture of Urtica urens. These are unique diagnostic characters and standards which will help in proper identification and confirmation about purity of raw drugs. The data summarised in this article helps in ensuring the quality and efficacy of raw drug as well as finished product of Urtica urens. These data may also be considered as pharmacopoeial standards for the homoeopathic drug Urtica urens L.


The authors are thankful to Dr. Raj K. Manchanda, Director General, Dr. Anil Khurana, Deputy Director General, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, New Delhi and Prof. Nirmala Babu Rao, Project Officer, Drug Standardisation Unit (H), Hyderabad for the facilities provided and encouragement. The authors are also thankful to the Director, HPL, Ghaziabad for providing authentic raw plant drug.

Financial support and sponsorship

The study was funded by Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.


1Clarke J. A Dictionary of Practical Materia Medica. 3rd ed. The Homoeopathic Publishing Company, London; 1987. p. 1486.
2Grieve M. A Modern Herbal. 3rd ed. London: Tiger Books International; 1931. p. 912.
3Joshi BC, Mukhija M, Kalia AN. Pharmacognostical review of Urtica dioica L. Int J Green Pharm 2014;8:201-9.
4Marrassini C, Acevedo C, Mino J, Ferraro G, Gorzalczany S. Evaluation of antiociceptive, anti-inflammatory activities and phytochemical analysis of aerial parts of Urtica urens L. Phytother Res 2010;24:1807-12.
5Doukkali Z, Taghzouti K, Bouidida EL, Nadjmouddine M, Cherrah Y, Alaoui K. Evaluation of anxiolytic activity of methanolic extract of Urtica urens in a mice model. Behav Brain Funct 2015;11:19.
6Guil-Guerrero JL, Rebolloso-Fuentes MM, Torija-Isasa ME. Fatty acids and carotenoids from stinging nettle. J Food Compos Anal 2003;16:111-9.
7Upton R. Stinging nettles leaf (Urtica dioica L.): Extraordinary vegetable medicine. J Herb Med 2013;3:9-38.
8Mzid M, Ben Khedir S, Ben Salem M, Regaieg W, Rebai T. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of ethanol and aqueous extracts from Urtica urens. Pharm Biol 2017;55:775-81.
9Mzid M, Ghlissi Z, Salem MB, Khedir SB, Chaabouni K, Ayedi F, et al. Chemoprotective role of ethanol extract of Urtica urens L. against the toxicity of imidacloprid on endocrine disruption and ovarian morphometric in female rats, GC/MS analysis. Biomed Pharmacother 2018;97:518-27.
10Sevki A, Gulsum T, Serkan E, Hasalettin D, Alaattin S. Assessing of anti-inflammatory effect of Small nettle' (Urtica urens) increasing polarity extracts. J Neuroim 2014;275:135.
11Farag MA, Weigend M, Luebert F, Brokamp G, Wessjohann LA. Phytochemical, phylogenetic, and anti-inflammatory evaluation of 43 Urtica accessions (stinging nettle) based on UPLC-Q-TOF-MS metabolomic profiles. Phytochemistry 2013;96:170-83.
12ESCOP Monographs, editor. Urticae folium/herba. In: European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy. New York: ESCOP; 2003. p. 521-7.
13Jimoh F, Adedapo A, Aliero A, Afolayan A. Polyphenolic and biological activities of leaves extracts of Argemonesub fusiformis (Papaveraceae) and Urtica urens (Urticaceae). Rev Biol Trop 2010;58:1517-31.
14Doukkali Z, Bouidida H, Srifi A, Taghzouti K, Cherrah Y, Alaoui K. Anxiolytic plants in Morocco: Ethnobotanical and ethno-pharmacological study. Phytotherapy 2015;13:306-13.
15Chrubasik JE, Roufogalis BD, Wagner H, Chrubasik S. A comprehensive review on the stinging nettle effect and efficacy profiles. Part II: Urticae radix. Phytomedicine 2007;14:568-79.
16Boericke W. New Manual of Homoeopathic Materia Medica & Repertory [with Relationship of Remedies], Second Re-Augmented & Revised Edition Based. 9th ed. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers; 2002.
17Riley DS. Materia Medica of New and Old Homoeopathic Medicines. USA: Springer-Verlag GmbH.; 2012.
18Farrington EA. Condensed Materia Medica by Constantine Hering. 4th ed. New Delhi: Jain Publishing Co.; 1978. p. 936.
19Ministry of Health. Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of India. Vol. 1. New Delhi: Ministry of Health; 1971. p. 188.
20World Health Organization. Quality Control Methods for Medicinal Plant Materials. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998.
21Quality Standards of Indian Medicinal Plants. Vol. 1. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research; 2003. p. 237.
22Johansen DA. Plant Micro Technique. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc.; 1940.
23Evans WC. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy. 15th ed. London: Saunders; 2002. p. 245-7.
24Kokate CK, Purohit AP, Gokhale SB. Textbook of Pharmacognosy. 42nd ed., Vol. 1. Nirali Publications; Pune. 2009.