• Users Online:960
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 212-219

Chemoprofiling of homoeopathic drug Holarrhena antidysenterica L.


1 Dr. DP Rastogi Central Research Institute (H), Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, New Delhi, Ministry of Ayush, Government of, India

Date of Submission19-May-2018
Date of Acceptance26-Dec-2018
Date of Web Publication08-Feb-2019

Correspondence Address:
Ms. Rakhi Mishra
Dr. DP Rastogi, Central Research Institute for Homoeopathy, A-1/1, Sector-24, Noida - 201 301, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijrh.ijrh_29_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Chemoprofiling of homoeopathic drug/tincture (HT) represents a comprehensive approach for evaluation of quality, purity, safety and efficacy of HT. This paper reflects the chemoprofiling of Homoeopathic drug Holarrhena antidysentrica L. Objective: The objective of this study is to standardise Holarrhena antidysenterica mother tincture by taking the samples from four different sources: Dr D. P. Rastogi, CRI (H) Noida (A) and three from market (labelled as B, C and D). Materials and Methods: The authentic sample of bark of Holarrhena antidysenterica supplied by the Centre of Medicinal Plants Research in Homoeopathy, Emerald, Tamil Nadu, India was used to prepare the mother tincture (as per the Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of India). The solvents used throughout the study, namely, ethanol, high-pressure liquid chromatography water, cyclohexane, chloromethane and diethylamine, were of analytical grade purity (MERCK Ltd.). Physicochemical properties, ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy and high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) chemoprofile of raw drug and mother tinctures were standardised and compared with market samples. Results: The present study reveals the moisture content (14.40%), total ash (4.65%), alcohol (18.0%), water extractive values (16.0%), total solids (1.47%), weight/ml (0.92 g) and alcohol content (60.6%). In UV spectroscopy, λmaxvalues were observed at 228 and 278 nm in HT. HPTLC analysis of in-house HT (A) and three market samples (B, C, D) was performed by using cyclohexane: chloromethane: diethylamine (7:3:1, v/v/v) as mobile phase. Under UV light (254, 366 nm) and in the presence of visualising agent Dragendroff, bands of active constituent were observed in all the four samples. However, excess amount of active constituents were found in in-house HT (a) rather than the market samples (B, C and D). Conclusion: The present physicochemical and phytochemical data may be considered as pharmacopoeia standards for the homoeopathic drug Holarrhema antidysentrica L.

Keywords: Drug standardisation, High-performance thin-layer chromatography, High-performance thin-layer chromatography fingerprint, Homoeopathic drug, Physicochemical, Ultraviolet


How to cite this article:
Mishra R, Kumar M, Dwivedi B, Arya B S, Arya R, Khurana A, Manchanda RK. Chemoprofiling of homoeopathic drug Holarrhena antidysenterica L.. Indian J Res Homoeopathy 2018;12:212-9

How to cite this URL:
Mishra R, Kumar M, Dwivedi B, Arya B S, Arya R, Khurana A, Manchanda RK. Chemoprofiling of homoeopathic drug Holarrhena antidysenterica L.. Indian J Res Homoeopathy [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Sep 17];12:212-9. Available from: http://www.ijrh.org/text.asp?2018/12/4/212/251914




  Introduction Top


Holarrhena antidysenterica L. of the family Apocynaceae[1] is also known as conessi bark in English, kutaja in Sanskrit, kura or kurchi in Hindi and found throughout many forests of India, in Travancore, Assam and Uttar Pradesh. Holarrhena antidysentrica Linn. f is a small deciduous tree, with brown bark. The bark contains a large number of alkaloids[2] such as conessine, holonamine, kuchine, kurchicine, holarrhimine and conimine.[3],[4] It acts as a good astringent, anthelmintic, amoebicidal and has diuretic-like property. The bark and seeds have been used in the treatment of many diseases such as colic, dyspepsia, piles,[5] dysentery, diseases of spleen, diseases of the skin, diarrhoea, anaemia, epilepsy, stomach pain and cholera.[6] Kurchicin, an active principle of Holarrhena antidysenterica, is highly effective against causative microorganisms of diarrhoea and dysentery, especially amoebic types.[7] It has huge medicinal values due to the presence of a large number of alkaloids.[8] In Homoeopathy, Holarrhena antidysentrica is used for the complaints of both chronic and acute dysentery with large quantity of mucus,[9] excessive blood, colic pain, fever, piles, leprosy and skin diseases,[10] tenesmus, emaciation, loss of appetite and aversion of food colicky around the navel, aggravated by lying on the right side but better by lying on the left side. According to the Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of India, its bark is used for the preparation of mother tincture.


  Materials and Methods Top


The plant material Holarrhena antidysenterica was supplied by the Centre for Medicinal Plant Research in Homoeopathy, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu. In-house mother tinctures were prepared from authentic materials and the other three mother tinctures were purchased from market.

Chemical and reagents

All solvents used in this study were of analytical grade, and purified water was of high-pressure liquid chromatography grade. Post-chromatographic derivatisation of developed Thin-layer Chromatography (TLC) plates was done using Dragendroff's reagent. Dragendroff's reagent was prepared by dissolving 0.85 g-basis bismuth nitrate in 10-ml glacial acetic acid and 40-ml water under heating if necessary (Sol. A). Sol. B was prepared by dissolving 8-g potassium iodide in 30-ml water, and then stock solutions A + B solutions were mixed 1:1 (v/v) and 4-ml glacial acetic acid and 20-ml purified water were added.[11] Freshly prepared solution of 10% sodium nitrite was used for better visibility of high-performance TLC (HPTLC) plate.

Preparation of standard mother tincture

100 g of coarsely powdered bark was taken and 635-ml alcohol and 400-ml water were added to make 1000 ml of mother tincture using the percolation method (as per the Homoeopathic Pharmacopeia of India).[12]

Apparatus

CAMAG Spotting device – Linomat V automatic sample spotter; syringe: 10 μL (Switzerland); TLC chamber – Glass twin trough chamber (20 × 10); densitometer – TLC scanner 3 with visionCATS software; CAMAG; HPTLC plate – 20 cm × 10 cm, pre-coated silica gel 60F254 plate.

Physicochemical properties

Phytochemical analysis

Phytochemical tests were conducted from the bark of Holarrhena antidysenterica to identify the various phytochemicals present in the plant material. The various tests[13],[14] are described below and observations are recorded in [Table 1].
Table 1: Phytochemical test

Click here to view


Test for flavonoids

Sulphuric acid (H2 SO4 test): The test solution was treated with concentrated H2 SO4. Formation of orange colour indicates the presence of flavonoids.

Tests for alkaloids

  1. Dragendroff's test: To 2–3 ml of the filtrate, add a few drops of Dragendroff's reagent. Formation of orange brown precipitate indicates the presence of alkaloids
  2. Mayer's test: To 2–3 ml of the filtrate, add a few drops of Mayer's reagent. Formation of cream precipitate indicates the presence of alkaloids.


Test for triterpenoids

Salkowski's test: To the test solution, add a few drops of concentrated sulphuric acid, shake well and allow to stand for some time. Red colour appears in the lower layer indicating the presence of sterols, and formation of yellow-coloured lower layer indicates the presence of triterpenoids.

Test for steroids

Salkowski's test: Chloroform solution of the extract when shaken with concentrated acid and on standing yields red colour.

Test for glycosides

Sodium hydroxide reagent: Dissolve a small amount of alcoholic extract in 1 ml water and add sodium hydroxide solution. A yellow colour indicates the presence of glycosides.

Test for saponins

Froth test- A pinch of the dried powdered plant material was added to 2–3 ml of distilled water. The mixture was shaken vigorously. Formation of foam indicates the presence of saponin.

Chemoprofiling by high-performance thin-layer chromatography analysis

Evaporate 25 ml of mother tincture on water bath to remove alcohol, basified with ammonia and extract with (3 × 20) ml of chloroform. Combine and concentrate chloroform layer to 2 ml. Carry out HPTLC of chloroform extract of mother tincture on silica gel 60 F254 pre-coated plate using cyclohexane: chloromethane: diethylamine (7:3:1 v/v) as mobile phase.[15],[16]

The concentrated chloroform extracts (A, B, C and D) were used for the HPTLC study. The extracts were spotted in the form of band of width 8.0 mm with a microlitre syringe on pre-coated silica gel aluminium plate 60F254, using a Linomat V sample applicator. A constant application rate of 3 and 5 μL was employed. The slit dimension was kept at 6.00 mm × 0.30 mm, and 20 mm/s scanning speed was employed. The mobile phase (10 ml) consisting of cyclohexane: chloromethane: diethylamine (7:3:1 v/v/v) was taken for HPTLC analysis. Linear ascending development was carried out in a 20 cm × 10 cm twin trough glass chamber (Camag, Switzerland) saturated with the mobile phase at room temperature for 25 min. The length of the chromatogram run was 8 cm and, subsequent to the development, the TLC plates were dried in a current of air with the help of hot air dryer in a wooden chamber with adequate ventilation. Densitometric scanning was performed at 254 nm and 366 nm by reflectance scanning and operated by visionCATS software resident in the system.

Ultraviolet spectrophotometric studies

With spectrophotometer set at range 190–1100 nm, samples and standard were put in cuvettes. Before analysis, cuvettes were washed with ethanol, analysis was performed on Specord 200 plus spectrophotometer Analytical Jena AG, Konrad-Zuse-Str.1, 07745 Jena, Germany and Analytical Jena WinAspect software was used for the ultraviolet (UV) analysis.

Samples (in-house mother tincture used for UV analysis) were prepared by mixing 1 part of mother tincture and 99 parts of absolute alcohol (1:99) and filtered through membrane filter prior to UV analysis.


  Results Top


Physicochemical studies

The determined data under the physicochemical study for the raw drug are summarised in [Table 2]. Mother tincture preparation and its standardisation are summarised in [Table 3] and [Table 4], respectively. Qualitative phytochemical test loss on drying revealed the presence of water in the plant and also some volatile organic matter. Results of physicochemical studies are summarised in [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4].
Table 2: Standardisation of raw drug

Click here to view
Table 3: Formulation of mother tincture (percolation technique used)

Click here to view
Table 4: Standardisation of mother tincture

Click here to view


High-performance thin-layer chromatography (fingerprinting)

Holarrhena antidysenterica in-house mother tincture was prepared in the laboratory and labelled as A and other three mother tinctures purchased from the market were labelled as B, C and D. The profile of chromatographic separation was scanned at 254 nm and 366 nm wavelength. At 254 nm, five spots appeared in in-house mother tincture (A) at Rf0.20, 0.35, 0.44, 0.73 and 0.87; five spots appeared in market sample (B) at Rf0.21, 0.33, 0.46, 0.72 and 0.86; four spots appeared in sample (C) at Rf0.34, 0.43, 0.74 and 0.88 and four spots appeared in sample (D) at Rf0.36, 0.42, 0.71 and 0.86 (all brown) [Figure 1]. While chromatogram scanned at 366 nm showed six spots in in-house mother tincture (A) at Rf0.21, 0.31, 0.53, 0.59 0.73 and 0.89, five spots appeared in market sample (B) at Rf0.32, 0.51, 0.58, 0.72 and 0.88; five spots appeared in sample (C) at Rf0.31, 0.54, 0.60, 0.72 and 0.90 and six spots appeared in sample (D) at Rf0.20, 0.31, 0.55, 0.59, 0.74 and 0.89 (all blue) [Figure 2], chromatogram after spray Dragendroff's reagent and then 10% sodium nitrite showed five spots in in-house mother tincture (A) at Rf0.28, 0.38, 0.43, 0.47 and 0.63; five spots appeared in market sample (B) at Rf0.27, 0.37, 0.43, 0.48 and 0.61; three spots appeared in sample (C) at Rf0.39, 0.42, 0.62 and five spots appeared in sample (D) at Rf0.28, 0.37, 0.42, 0.46 and 0.61 (all orange) [Figure 3].
Figure 1: High-performance thin-layer chromatography fingerprints of chloroform extract of Holarrhena antidysentrica at 254 nm. Track A in-house sample; Track B, C, D market samples

Click here to view
Figure 2: High-performance thin-layer chromatography fingerprints of chloroform extract of Holarrhena antidysentrica at 366 nm. Track A in-house sample; Track B, C, D market samples

Click here to view
Figure 3: High-performance thin-layer chromatography fingerprints of chloroform extract of Holarrhena antidysenterica after derivatisation with Dragendroff's reagent. Track A in-house sample; Track B, C, D market samples

Click here to view


It is evident from the data that these are characteristics for the studied drug, which will help in the identification and authentication of the mother tincture. The HPTLC chemoprofiling of in-house mother tincture (A) and market sample (B, C and D) was almost similar. However, excess amount of active constituents were found in in-house homoeopathic drug/tincture (A) rather than the market samples (B, C and D). These may be considered as valuable standards in pharmacopoeia and act as vital fingerprint parameters to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of the drug.

Ultraviolet spectrophotometeric studies

UV absorption spectra (λmax) of in-house mother tincture of Holarrhena antidysenterica were found at 228 nm and 278 nm [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Ultraviolet absorption spectra (λmax) of extract from homoeopathic drug/tincture of Holarrhena antidysentrica

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Physicochemical analysis

Physicochemical and Phytochemical analysis using various reagents showed the presence of secondary metabolites such as tannins, phenolic compounds, alkaloids and flavonoid. Physicochemical constants, namely, ash, extracted values and other parameters can be used as a reliable aid to check the identity, purity and strength. HPTLC chemoprofiling is done as an important tool for the authentication of herbal drugs and formulations. The results obtained from the study could be utilised for scientific validation and formulating standards for the quality assurance of the drug. In HPTLC chemoprofiling, the developed chromatogram and Rf values of bands will be specific for the drug with the selected solvent system. UV spectroscopic study exhibits prominent peaks, which serve as characteristic standards.


  Conclusion Top


The present physicochemical and phytochemical study of Holarrhena antidysenterica L. reveals that its bark is rich in phytoconstituents. In UV spectroscopy, λmax values of active constituents of Holarrhena antidysenterica L. were observed at 228 and 278 nm in HT. HPTLC Chemo profiling study shows bands of active constituent were observed in all the four samples, in-house HT (A) and three market samples (B, C and D). However, excess amount of active constituents were found in in-house HT (A) rather than the market samples (B, C and D) [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]. Hence, the present physicochemical, phytochemical and Chemoprofiling fingerprinting data of Holarrhena antidysenterica L. may be considered as pharmacopoeia standards for the aforesaid drug.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.



 
  References Top

1.
Johari S, Gandhi T. A randomized single blind parallel group study comparing monoherbal formulation containing Holarrhena antidysenterica extract with mesalamine in chronic ulcerative colitis patients. Anc Sci Life 2016;36:19-27.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Asmita N, Laddha KS. Effect of enzymes on extraction of phytoconstituents from Holarrhena antidysenterica. Int J Pharmacol Phytochem Res 2013;5:68-73.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Vikramaditya. A Compendium of Active Principles/Phytochemicals of Medicinal Plants used in Homoeopathy. Ghaziabad: Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia Laboratory; Vol. 1.; 2001. p. 63.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ali Shah SM, Usmanghani K, Akhtar N, Asif HM, Akram M, Ahmed K, et al. Monograph of Holarrhena antidysenterica (Linn.) Wall. Int J Phytomed 2010;2:345-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pulikkottil AJ. Holarrhena antidysenterica (Linn.) Wall. Synonym H. pubescens (Buch. Ham.) Wall. ex G. Don. Family: Apocynaceae; Holarrhena antidysenterica. Encyclopedia of Medicinal Plants. Herbs – Medicinal plants usage and Identifi cation Data Base.; 2016.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sharma PC, Yelne MB, Dennis TJ. Database on Medicinal Plants Used in Ayurveda. Central Council for Research in Ayurveda and Siddha. Department of ISM & H, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Reprint 2005. Vol. 2, 3. New Delhi: Pearl Offset Press Pvt. Ltd.; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Bhutani KK, Ali M, Sharma SR, Vaid RM, Gupta DK. Three new steroidal alkaloids from the bark of Holarrhena antidysenterica. Phytochemistry 1988;27:925-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Daswani P, Birdi TJ, Antarkar DS, Antia NH. Investigation of the antidiarrheal activity of Holarrhena antidysenterica. Indian J Pharm Sci 2002;64:164-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Boericke W. Homoeopathic Materia Medica and Repertory. Reprint Edition. New Delhi: B. Jain Publisher (P) Ltd.; 2007. p. 1063.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Dutta AT, Ghosh BK, Gupta JC. The seasonal variation of alkaloids in different parts of Holarrhena antidysenterica wall. and the alkaloid content in the bark at different ages. Part 1. Indian J Med Res 1950;38:467-72.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Indian Pharmacopoeia. Vol. 1. Ghaziabad: The Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission; 2014. p. 782.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of India. Vol. 1. New Delhi: The Controller of Publications; 1971. p. 133.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Chandrashekar R, Rao SN. Phytochemical analysis of ethanolic extract of leaves of Leucas indica (EELLI). Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2013;4:33-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Koteswar Sarma DS, Suresh Babu AV. Pharmacognostic and phytochemical studies of Thespesiapopulnea Linn. J Chem Pharm Res 2011;3:327-244.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Gupta AK, Neeraj T, Madhu S. Quality standards of Indian medicinal plants. Indian Council of Medical Research 2003;1:109-16.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Wagner H, Bladt S, Zgainski EM. Plant Drug Analysis: A Thin Layer Chromatography Atlas. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1984. p. 5-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1025    
    Printed55    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded226    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]